Assignment 2: study plan

Rely on our professional academic writers and forget about missing deadlines. All custom papers are written from scratch.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

PLEAESE FOLLOW THE INSTRUSTION BELOW, ZERO PLAGIARISM, FIVE REFERENCES NOT MORE THAN FIVE YEARS, 7TH APA FORMAT/WRITING STYLE.


Assignment 2: Study Plan

Your Name

Department of ABC, University of ABC

ABC 101: Course Name

Professor (or Dr.) Firstname Lastname

Date


2

Assignment 2: Study Plan

A study plan is essential for the purpose of staying on track and remaining focused during the completion of each progress goal and task. It will also help to avoid utter chaos and prevent stress related to confusion and procrastination (McKoy, 2018). The purpose of this paper is to explain the summary of the strengths and opportunities for improvement based on the test questions, create a study plan including three smart goals and associated tasks, and describe the resources to be used to complete the goals and tasks.

Summary of the Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement

My test grade was 70% out of 100%. Upon completion of the practice test questions, various strengths and opportunities for improvement were noted. Strengths comprised excellent skills in interviewing, assessment, intoxication and withdrawal; obtaining history and physicals; and the altered mental status. Opportunities for improvement include enhancing knowledge about how to use psychometrically validated tools such as the DSM-5, Beck Depression Inventory, the HEXACO, and the Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire. Also, I found myself to be very competent in the diagnosis and treatment sections, especially when distinguishing between different disorders. I also plan to improve my knowledge regarding ethical issues in the medical field.

SMART Goals and Tasks

Goal 1: To help me prepare for my national certification, I will study and follow the weekly readings in the course materials including the psychiatric interview.

Task one: Creating a timetable for studying specific material.

Task two: Specifying hours and the time needed for each material during the preparation of the national examination.

Task three: Consulting with my preceptor about the information I may need to know about as I prepare for my national certification.

Goal 2: To study the chapters of the “Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Certification Review Manual” by the end of the practicum period.

Task one: Following the weekly readings for each course.

Task two: Setting apart a specific day each week for reviewing the chapters assigned for the week.

Task three: Allocating a two hour period for studying.

Goal 3: To list the areas of my knowledge base that I consider weak and decide the topics I need to concentrate more on by week eleven.

Task one: Writing down my weaknesses.

Task two: Reviewing each of my weaknesses during the makeup hours allocated in my timetable.

Task three: Using weekly reading assignments to assess any additional witnesses.

To measure my progress, I will compare my overall main goals with the degree of accomplishment I experienced during specific milestones (for example, weekly milestones). I will also assess how well I completed my goals and go back to the already accomplished goals to determine any details that may have been missed initially (Kverno & Fenton, 2021). I will also use my assignment grades as a way of measuring my progress as well as utilizing the feedback I receive from my preceptor and instructors (Harper et al., 2017).

Resources to Accomplish the Goals and Tasks

I will utilize the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Review Manual as a key resource during the progress of the course (Horowitz & Posmontier, 2020). Additionally, I will utilize my relationship with colleagues to form a study group using Internet applications like Microsoft Teams or Zoom. Also, I will utilize an online review course to obtain online educational tutoring as a resource for completing the goals and tasks (Peterson et al., 2019).

Conclusion

I plan to devote a lot of time and effort to perfecting my study plan and ensuring that it helps me achieve my goals and tasks. I will also stick to the plan and utilize every available resource to establish and achieve my goals. In the process, I will incorporate other process goals and objectives that will help me achieve my long-term goals. I will utilize several appropriate resources to prepare myself and make sure that I am confident and ready for my national certification exam.

References

Harper, D. C., McGuinness, T. M., & Johnson, J. (2017). Clinical residency training: Is it essential to the Doctor of Nursing Practice for nurse practitioner preparation?. Nursing outlook65(1), 50-57.

Horowitz, J. A., & Posmontier, B. (2020). A call to action: Reclaiming our PMH APN heritage. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing34(5), 351-354.

Kverno, K. S., & Fenton, A. (2021). Specialization Within a Specialty: Advanced Practice Psychiatric Nursing Pathways for the Greatest Good. Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services59(10), 13-18.

McCoy, K. T. (2018). Achieving full scope of practice readiness using evidence for psychotherapy teaching in web and hybrid approaches in psychiatric mental health advanced practice nursing education. Perspectives in psychiatric care54(1), 74-83.

Peterson, B. L., Pittenger, A. L., Kaas, M. J., & Lounsbery, J. L. (2019). Partnering for a sustainable interprofessional psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner education curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education58(12), 723-727.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric

  Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Points:

Points Range:
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.

Feedback:

Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.

Points:

Points Range:
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.

Feedback:

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.

Points:

Points Range:
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.

Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1-2 APA format errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains 3-4 APA format errors

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains five or more APA format errors

Feedback:

Show Descriptions

Show Feedback

Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Good

80%–89%
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Fair

70%–79%
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.

Feedback:

Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.

Good

80%–89%
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.

Fair

70%–79%
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.

Feedback:

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.

Good

80%–89%
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.

Fair

70%–79%
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Fair

70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.

Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

Fair

70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1-2 APA format errors

Fair

70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains 3-4 APA format errors

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains five or more APA format errors

Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric

SMAT PLAN

Can you imagine an athlete deciding to run a marathon without training for the event? Most ambitious people who have set this goal will follow a specific training plan that will allow them to feel confident and prepared on the big day. Similarly, if you want to feel confident and prepared for your certification exam, you should create and follow a plan that will thoroughly prepare you for success.

In this Assignment, you will review the study plan that you developed in NRNP 6665, and revise your plan as necessary, which will serve as the road map for you to follow to attain your certification.

To Prepare

· Reflect on the study plan you created in NRNP 6665. Did you accomplish your SMART goals? What areas of focus still present opportunities for growth?

·

The Assignment

· Revise your study plan summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Develop 3–4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.

· Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online