Upload here your PowerPoint presentation about the LICHTENSTEIN AND MORGAN case. Format is attached

Upload here your PowerPoint presentation about the LICHTENSTEIN AND MORGAN case. Format is attached
Presentation This presentation should be an opportunity to develop an explanation of (a brief) your thoughts and opinions based on facts and supporting data about the LICHTENSTEIN AND MORGAN case. Actions Extract relevant data, information, and facts from Report Two. This document is the basis for your case analysis that you must use to generate your Report Two. ( Prepare a PowerPoint presentation. Develop your PowerPoint presentation using your Report Two material. Requirements: There is no reasonable slide number maximum number. You must complete the requirements listed below. I am interested in clarity of thought and succinct information, not unreadable and congested text slides. I recommend using graphic/visual aids if deemed necessary. I recommend adding notes to the notes field in PowerPoint. If you place a graphic or bulleted statement, write in the notes field a brief explanation of the intent of the slide. The body/structure of the presentation. Cover with the title, your name, and other relevant data. Introduction/abstract (no more than two slides). one slide is enough if you include notes in the notes field. Body. Conclusion Summary of findings Lesson learned. (what you have learned writing the report and preparing the presentation) Identify, describe, and formulate your thoughts about: Your paper must cover the five topics of interest. The requested research and analysis subsets might only be achievable for some illicit markets. Describe the case The body needs to describe the case. Narrative of how they did it (modus operandi) It would be best to write a short introductory narrative about the case. Identify and include in the narrative the following: Who, how, what, why, where, and when Identify and explain the violations. Develop graphical representations (if applicable) of the flowchart representing the flow of funds/value. Illicit finance analysis Describe the financial mechanics of how the criminal activity occurred. Answer the following questions five primary questions: (do you remember this from class and the test?) What is the revenue generation scheme? (Here, you apply what you found in section 1, (a) of this rubric) What are the points of placement of the procedure? (if applicable) Where were the assets stored? How were the assets moved? What assets were used to purchase goods or services? (if applicable) Money laundering analysis Using the findings and thoughts previously stated, developed describe the money laundering process. Was there placement of illicit proceeds? If so, how did they do it, and where did it occur? Did they layer the proceeds? If so, how did they do it? Were the proceeds integrated into the economy? NOTE: If you need clarification or assistance, please get in touch with me ASAP. If the presentation needs to be more balanced, clear, and has poor arguments I will as you to brief it to me. “Nothing incites to money-crimes like great poverty or great wealth.” Mark Twain
Upload here your PowerPoint presentation about the LICHTENSTEIN AND MORGAN case. Format is attached
1 Intelligence Report 2 Case Analysis Name Date CRJ-365-Z1 Advanced Issues in Economic Crime Intelligence Report 2 Case Analysis Descriptive Data on the Revenue Generation Scheme used by the Perpetrators The criminal complaint and arrest warrant for “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan was based on an investigation into a cryptocurrency-related revenue-generating scam. Heather Morgan and “Dutch” Lichtenstein were the people behind the plan. The notorious criminal Lichtenstein has already been found guilty of fraud and money laundering. The method was made possible by Morgan, a former worker of a Bitcoin exchange who had acquired customer data. To carry out the strategy, the criminals gathered a group of people (Steinmetz, 2023). The scam involves market manipulation, precisely the pump-and-dump technique. The offenders would locate a low-value cryptocurrency and buy much of it, raising the price. Then, they would advertise the cryptocurrency on social media, generating buzz and drawing in new customers. The offenders would sell their stock whenever the price hit a particular point, causing the price to crash and leaving other investors with huge losses. The scheme’s perpetrators employed several strategies, including price manipulation, misleading advertising, and social media promotion. They also exploited stolen client data to construct phoney accounts on the Bitcoin exchange and increase trading volume. The plan was run to make money. The culprits could make large profits by influencing the price of low-value cryptocurrencies and subsequently selling their holdings at higher prices. The plan was carried out on a large scale using global social media networks and Bitcoin exchanges. The offenders used fictitious personas and anonymous communication methods to hide their actions. The criminals coordinated their activities and regularly carried out trades during the several months while the scam was in operation (Garcia et al., 2023). The “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan revenue-generating scam involved pump-and-dump manipulation of low-value coins. Global social media networks and cryptocurrency exchanges were used to carry out the scam on a large scale. The scheme’s perpetrators, motivated by financial gain, employed several strategies, including deceptive advertising and client data theft, to carry it out. Examining the scheme underlines the need for more industry regulation and oversight as well as the possible risks involved with using cryptocurrencies. Threat Actors Various threat actors, such as criminal organizations, state actors, insurgencies, and terrorist groups, have started to turn to the illicit cryptocurrency market as a source of income. These criminals use the Bitcoin market’s anonymity and lack of regulation to engage in unlawful operations like money laundering, drug trafficking, and financing terrorism. The threat actors in the cases of “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan were criminal gangs. In the past, Lichtenstein had engaged in criminal behavior and was found guilty of fraud and money laundering. The method was made possible by Morgan, a former worker of a Bitcoin exchange who had acquired customer data. To carry out the strategy, the criminals gathered a group of people. “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan were the suspects in this investigation. They were accused of several federal offenses, including money laundering, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Significant fines and incarceration are imposed for these offenses. The accusation of conspiracy to conduct securities fraud was founded on the culprits’ use of a pump-and-dump scheme to manipulate the price of low-value cryptocurrencies. To increase trade activity on the Bitcoin exchange, the accused were said to have conspired to commit wire fraud by using stolen client data to create fake accounts. Securities fraud allegations were based on allegedly false statements given to potential investors. The allegations of wire fraud were based on the conspirators’ alleged use of electronic communication. The money laundering accusation hinged on fictitious monetary transactions that were supposed to convert the illegally obtained monies from the scheme into legitimate funds. The “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan case highlights a high threat posed by the unregulated Bitcoin market to criminal organizations. By taking advantage of the market’s decentralization and anonymity, these groups can engage in criminal conduct while reaping huge financial rewards. The federal charges, in this case, demonstrate the seriousness with which law enforcement agencies view this type of illegal activity and the necessity for increased regulation and oversight of the cryptocurrency industry. Illicit Finance Analysis Money was made through a pump-and-dump scheme using low-value coins by “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan. The scam’s perpetrators depended on their ability to increase demand for the target cryptocurrency to sustain the deception. When the stock price reached a certain threshold, the offenders would sell, plummeting the price and leaving other investors with massive losses. The scheme’s perpetrators employed several strategies, including deceptive advertising, social media promotion, and pricing manipulation. They also exploited stolen client data to construct phony accounts on the Bitcoin exchange and increase trading volume. There were various placement points in the plan. By identifying a low-value cryptocurrency and buying a lot of it, the offenders would artificially inflate its price through social media marketing. The offenders would sell their stock whenever the price hit a particular point, causing the price to crash and leaving other investors with huge losses. The fraudsters would then spend the money they had obtained illegally through the scheme on goods and services that they would use to carry out more of their illegal operations. The scheme’s assets were kept in several different locations. The criminals used physical and electronic storage techniques to keep hold of their valuables (Garcia et al., 2023). The unlawful earnings generated by the program were also converted into legitimate funds through various financial activities. Different techniques, such as physical conveyance and electronic transfers, shifted the assets. To simplify the movement of support, the offenders formed a network of people and frequently used anonymous communication channels to hide their operations. Diverse assets, from expensive products to illicit substances, were utilized to pay for goods and services. The culprits funded their criminal enterprises, such as money laundering, drug trafficking, and other unlawful operations, with the illicit monies obtained from the plan. The revenue-generating method employed by “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan involved a complicated financial service and transaction flow. The culprits hired electronic transfers, physical transportation, front and shell firms, and other strategies to move and control their assets. The accused moved their money using various financial services, including conventional banks and cryptocurrency exchanges (Kerr et al., 2023). They used a web of contacts to facilitate the flow of supplies, and they usually concealed their activities by using anonymous communication channels. The criminals used front and shell companies to hide their activities and cling to their wealth. Law enforcement agencies had more difficulty keeping tabs on these companies since they were often based in jurisdictions with loose regulations. Illegal proceeds funded the logistics and expert services for the operation. The assistance offered encompassed transport, storage but also legal and monetary advice. Money Laundering Analysis Money laundering was at the heart of “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan’s elaborate plot to generate new revenue. The perpetrators used various methods to move and control their assets, including electronic transfers, physical transportation, front and shell companies, and others. The first step in laundering money was hiding the illegal gains. Criminals used multiple channels to launder money into the banking system (Garcia et al., 2023): cryptocurrency exchanges and traditional banking services. They also employed front and shell firms to hide their actions and keep hold of their assets. Illegal proceeds were placed in several countries, including ones with lax legislation that made it easier to launder money obtained illegally. The culprits started layering after the illegal gains were integrated into the financial system. They moved their money between banks and jurisdictions using a variety of financial transactions, making it more challenging for law authorities to follow their movements. To further obfuscate the activity of money, the layering process required the use of intricate financial structures, including the use of front and shell firms. The criminals then absorbed the stolen money into the economy. They spent the money on luxury products, illegal drugs, and other services that helped them carry out their criminal enterprises. Several financial transactions, including anonymous communication methods and funds, transfer through front and shell firms, were used to integrate the unlawful proceeds. The sophisticated threat posed by criminal groups in the grey market for cryptocurrencies is highlighted by the money laundering technique employed by “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan. It is challenging for law enforcement organizations to identify and stop criminal activity due to sophisticated financial structures and money flow across accounts and jurisdictions. Finding the real beneficial owners of the assets becomes more challenging due to the use of front and shell firms. Criminology Effects Exploiting financial crimes like “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan’s revenue-generating scheme can harm society in several ways, including law and order, governance and corruption, economic ramifications, and social consequences. Additionally, financial crimes can foster a sense of injustice in society and diminish public confidence in the legal system. The victims may feel helpless and frustrated when they witness the criminals committing these atrocities and walking away with little to no repercussions. Additionally, the money gained from these crimes may finance other unlawful operations like terrorism and drug trafficking, further jeopardizing law and order. Financial crimes can compromise the integrity of public institutions and elected officials regarding governance and corruption. It may be more challenging for law enforcement agencies to identify and stop criminal activity when front and shell businesses are used, making it simpler for corrupt officials to commit crimes without worrying about getting discovered. The stability of financial markets and the health of the economy as a whole, on the other hand, can be significantly impacted by financial crimes. Pump-and-dump strategies that manipulate low-value coins can cause investors to suffer substantial losses and erode confidence in the Bitcoin system. Additionally, using illegal money to pay for products and services can lead to unfair competition by tilting the playing field in the market. Individuals and communities can suffer tremendously as a result of financial crimes. Financial crime victims may lose their entire life savings and experience psychological and emotional suffering. Additionally, using unlawful money to buy drugs and engage in other criminal activities can have a detrimental social impact by encouraging addiction, aggression, and other undesirable behaviors. Investors, companies, and the general public can all be targets of financial crimes like the revenue-generating scheme employed by “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan. Businesses may suffer from unfair competition and a lack of faith in the financial markets, while investors who fall prey to pump-and-dump scams may incur significant financial losses. The adverse social effects of financial crimes, such as the rise in the use of illegal drugs and other criminal activity, can also impact the broader public. Conclusion The “Dutch” Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan case demonstrates the severe danger financial crimes pose in the Bitcoin market. Criminals may be able to engage in unlawful operations, including money laundering, drug trafficking, and financing terrorism, by taking advantage of the anonymity and lack of market regulation. The pump-and-dump method adopted by the culprits as part of their revenue-generating scheme resulted in significant investor losses and damaged confidence in the Bitcoin market (Kerr et al., 2023). More regulation and control of the cryptocurrency business is required due to the culprits’ elaborate and sophisticated money laundering scheme. Financial crimes have many detrimental effects, including undermining public institutions’ integrity and law and order, harming people personally, and negatively affecting entire communities. Law enforcement agencies and governments must collaborate to combat financial crimes and hold individuals who engage in these illicit activities accountable for their conduct. References García-Monleón, F., Erdmann, A., & Arilla, R. (2023). A value-based approach to the adoption of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100342. Kerr, D. S., Loveland, K. A., Smith, K. T., & Smith, L. M. (2023). Cryptocurrency Risks, Fraud Cases, and Financial Performance. Risks, 11(3), 51. Steinmetz, F. (2023). The interrelations of cryptocurrency and gambling: Results from a representative survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107437.