Can please assist with this homework

Rely on our professional academic writers and forget about missing deadlines. All custom papers are written from scratch.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Please see attached for instructions

Assignment Directions

1.

1. The Week 6 Assignment: Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet is a learning activity that requires you to read an assigned article for the session you are taking the course, then answer questions on the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet. Both the required article and worksheet may change from session to session.

2. The NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric must be used to answer each of the criteria that will be graded for this assignment. The grading rubric is located at the bottom of this page below the References area.

3. Read the required research article assigned, then answer each question in your own words on the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet about the study.

4. Your required article is available to you in an announcement that has been posted in preview week and again in Week 5. Please go to your announcements to locate the required article assigned for this session. Look for the announcement with the following heading: 

IMPORTANT: Assigned Article for Week 6 Assignment

5. Download and complete the required 


Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.)


. This must be used.

6. The assignment contains the following and the below can be used to help answer each criteria area of the worksheet. Do not copy and paste the information below into your RRL worksheet. After reading the required research article, think about the research study and include what you learned from reading the study using your own words.

· Purpose of the Study: Using information from the required article and your own words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Type of Research & the Design: Using information from the required article and your own words, thoroughly summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Sample: Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Data Collection: Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Data Analysis: Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Limitations: Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Findings/Discussion: Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Reading Research Literature: Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Thoroughly summarize and include excellent details for the criteria.

· Use APA in-text citations. No more than two direct quotes can be used.

7. You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. Microsoft Office 365 is available for free through Resources/Technologies/Microsoft Office 365.

8. Review the tutorial for your Week 6 Assignment. The tutorial may look slightly different session to session. Grading criteria and rubric will be the same.

9. Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the Study

Using information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.

30 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

26 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

24 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

11 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the Design

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/Discussion

Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.

20 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research Literature

Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.

30 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

26 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

24 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

11 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar

10 pts

Excellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.

6 pts

Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.

4 pts

Fair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.

3 pts

Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.

0 pts

Very poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences

10 pts

Excellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.

5 pts

Good APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.

4 pts

Fair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.

3 pts

Poor APA formatting with many errors noted.

0 pts

Very poor APA with errors noted throughout.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use

0 pts

0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted

0 pts

20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction

0 pts

0 point deduction

Submitted on time

0 pts

Not submitted on time – Points deducted

1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

0 pts


2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses
Brief Summary of Results

U.S Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration

Bureau of Health Workforce
National Center for Health Workforce Analysis

About the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis
The National Center for Health Workforce Analysis (the National Center) informs public and private-sector
decision-making on the U.S. health workforce by expanding and improving health workforce data and its
dissemination to the public, and by improving and updating projections of supply of and demand for
health workers. For more information about the National Center, please visit our website at
http://bhw.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/index.html.

Suggested citation:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National
Center for Health Workforce Analysis. 2019. Brief Summary Results from the 2018 National Sample Survey
of Registered Nurses, Rockville, Maryland.

Copyright information:
All material appearing in this documentation is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied
without permission. Citation of the source, however, is appreciated.

i

Table of Contents____________________________________________

List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii

List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ii

Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1

Key Findings ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1

Summary of Survey Methodology …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Initial Findings from the NSSRN Survey ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

The Workforce ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3

Demographics and Diversity ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4

Education and Training …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

Employment ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8

Telehealth …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9

Salary and Earnings …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

Appendix ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12

ii

List of Figures_______________________________________________

Figure 1: Distribution of RNs by Graduation Year ……………………………………………………………………………. 3

Figure 2: Distribution of RNs by Age ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

Figure 3: Distribution of RNs by Race and Ethnicity …………………………………………………………………………. 5

Figure 4: Distribution of Race and Ethnicity by Initial Nursing Program Graduation Year …………………….. 5

Figure 5: Initial Nursing Education ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6

Figure 6: Highest Nursing and Nursing-Related Educational Attainment ……………………………………………. 6

Figure 7: Distribution of Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Licenses …………………………………………….. 7

Figure 8: Distribution of Full-Time/Part-Time Employment by Age Group …………………………………………. 8

Figure 9: Distribution of Employment Setting by Sex ………………………………………………………………………. 9

Figure 10: Telehealth in the Workplace ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Figure 11: Telehealth Usage by RNs …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Figure 12: Median Full-Time Earnings by Sex ……………………………………………………………………………….. 11

Figure 13: Median Full-Time Earnings by Degree Type ………………………………………………………………….. 11

Figure 14: Median Full-Time Earnings by Advanced Practice Type ………………………………………………….. 11

List of Tables________________________________________________

Table 1: RN Employment by State ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN) is the longest running survey of registered
nurses (RNs) in the United States. Since its inaugural assessment in 1977, the NSSRN has provided
educators, health workforce leaders, and policymakers with key details and developments of the nursing
workforce supply. Considered the cornerstone of nursing workforce data, this comprehensive exploration
provides a dynamic status of the RN population by revealing their demographics, educational attainment,
licenses and certifications, and employment characteristics. These continued data collections have
supported evaluations of government RN workforce programs, assisting in critical decision making
affecting the U.S. healthcare system. Highlighting the intricacies of the current RN status is essential for
developing strategies that address present-day healthcare challenges and the evolving nursing workforce
needs.

Since the last survey administration in 2008, the NSSRN questionnaire underwent a complete content
review, and large improvements were made based on changes in US health care landscape and best
practices in survey methodology. The latest survey also aims to reduce redundancy in the collection of
data and lower the response burden on participants. The 2018 NSSRN comprises questions derived from
both the National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (NSSNP) and the NSSRN for one concise survey
capturing a broader RN workforce and is the first production implementation that provides data for both
RNs and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) at the state and national levels.

In collaboration with the U.S Census Bureau, the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis
administered the 10th NSSRN data collection in 2018. From April 2018 to October 2018, a total of 50,273
registered nurses completed the survey via a web instrument or a paper questionnaire with an
unweighted response rate of 50.1 percent (49.1% weighted). This instrument gathered data from
participants with active RN licenses from all U.S. states revealing a comprehensive look into the RN
workforce.

Key Findings
 There are an estimated 3,957,661 licensed registered nurses living in the United States. In 2017,

roughly 83 percent (3,272,872 RNs) held a nursing related job.
 The average age of an RN was 50 years old; however, most nurses (53%) were less than 50 years

old.
 Nurses are more diverse today than shown in the 2008 NSSRN study. Both minority groups and

men have seen a slight increase within the RN population.
 Most of the RN workforce is college educated (63.9%). Of them, nurses with a master’s or

doctorate degree accounted for 19.3 percent.
 Advanced Practice RNs account for approximately 11.5 percent of the nursing workforce.
 Telehealth capabilities were reported in 32.9 percent of nurses’ workplaces. Among them, 50.3

percent of nurses used telehealth in their practice.
 Median earnings for full-time RNs were $73,929, while part-time RNs earned a median amount

of $39,985.

2

Summary of Survey Methodology

In order to capture the current state of the RN workforce, the 2008 NSSRN questionnaire was revised and
tested to minimize respondent response time burden and includes questions for Nurse Practitioners and
on new health care delivery patterns.

A sample of 102,690 registered nurses were randomly selected from over 4.6 million licensure records
provided by the National Council of the State Boards of Nursing and individual state nursing boards. The
licensure records were sorted by state, license type (RN or NP), and demographic variables. Sampling rates
from each state were then determined to set a baseline for representation.

Data collection for the NSSRN spanned 24 weeks. The survey offered respondents the opportunity to
participate via a web instrument or paper questionnaire, after being contacted by mail. Additionally,
respondents had access to a staffed questionnaire assistance telephone line where they could receive
login assistance, language support, or other assistance. A total of 50,273 eligible participants completed
this survey with an unweighted response rate of 50.1 percent (49.1% weighted).

Additional information about the development, plan, and operations for the 2018 NSSRN can be found in
the Technical Documentation for the NSSRN located on the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis’
NSSRN website.1

1 https://bhw.hrsa.gov/health-workforce-analysis/data/national-sample-survey-registered-nurses

3

Initial Findings from the NSSRN Survey

The Workforce
As of December 31, 2017, there were an estimated 3,957,661 actively licensed registered nurses living in
the United States, a 29 percent increase from 2008. Of those, 3,272,872 (83%) were actively licensed and
employed in nursing (a 26% increase from 2008). Approximately 40% of the current RN workforce
graduated from their initial nursing program in 2005 or later (Figure 1). In 2017, respondents had an
average of 18.9 years of experience post initial RN licensure.

Figure 1: Distribution of RNs by Graduation Year

*Data for this time period reflects more than a two-year interval. As the survey sample was selected from a list of
licensed nurses constructed from different sources during year 2017, the count of new graduates in the most
recent year(s) may not be fully reflected in the “2015 and later” estimate.

3.
3%

1.
5% 2

.0
%

3.
1%

3.
0% 3.

2%

3.
2%

3.
1% 3.
4%

3.
0%

2.
7%

3.
6% 4

.2
%

4.
3%

3.
8%

3.
7%

3.
5% 3

.9
%

5.
1%

6.
5% 7

.1
%

7.
2% 7.
4% 8

.1
%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

Pe
ce

nt
ag

e

Year of Graduation

4

Demographics and Diversity
The average age of respondents was 47.9 years old, with nearly half (47.5%) of all RNs aged 50 or older
(Figure 2). Figure 3 shows that White, non-Hispanic RNs accounted for the largest proportion (73.3%),
followed by Hispanic RNs (10.2%), Black, non-Hispanic, RNs (7.8%), Asian, non-Hispanic RNs (5.2%), and
multiple races (1.7%). Racial and ethnic minority groups accounted for 26.7 percent of the RNs in this
study. In particular, for RNs who graduated in the past two decades, the proportion of minority groups
(those of not NH White descent) appeared to be higher when compared to those licensed prior to that
period. This increase in proportion in minority groups is largely driven by Hispanic RNs (Figure 4).

Men in nursing also continue to be a growing demographic in nursing. In 2018, male RNs represented 9.6
percent of the population, an increase from 7.1 percent in the 2008 NSSRN study.

Figure 2: Distribution of RNs by Age

8.5%

10.7%
11.5%

10.3%

11.5%

9.7%

12.0% 11.9%

8.5%

3.4%

2.0%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

<30 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+

Pe
rc

en
ta

ge

Age

5

Figure 3: Distribution of RNs by Race and Ethnicity

Figure 4: Distribution of Race and Ethnicity by Initial Nursing Program Graduation Year

White,
non-Hispanic,

73.3%
Hispanic, Latino,

or Spanish,
10.2%

Black, non-
Hispanic, 7.8%

Asian,
non-

Hispanic,
5.2%

American
Indian or

Alaska Native,
non-Hispanic,

0.3%

Native
Hawaiian or
Other Pacific
Islander, non-
Hispanic, 0.6%

Some Other Race,
non-Hispanic,

1.0%

Multiple Races, non-
Hispanic, 1.7%

Other,
26.7%

68.8%

71.9%

72.3%

72.9%

77.8%

77.1%

83.3%

82.8%

86.0%

19.5%

14.4%

15.0%

13.7%

9.5%

9.4%

10.0%

7.4%

6.2%

10.3%

10.3%

9.7%

12.0%

9.4%

8.4%

8.5%

7.5%

7.0%

5.1%

6.5%

6.9%

6.7%

7.6%

9.5%

3.4%

6.9%

4.8%

5.5%

4.5%

4.9%

4.8%

4.5%

5.7%

3.5%

4.6%

3.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2013 and after

2008-2012

2003-2007

1998-2002

1993-1997

1988-1992

1983-1987

1978-1982

1977 and before

White, non-Hispanic Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic All Others, non-Hispanic

6

Education and Training
In the 2018 survey, the most commonly reported initial educational qualification for registered nurses in
the United States were the Associate (48.5%) and Bachelor (39.2%) degrees (Figure 5). When asked about
the highest nursing or nursing-related educational attainment, nearly two-thirds of the RNs (63.9 %) had
a Bachelor degree or higher (44.6% earned a Bachelor degree and 19.3% earned a graduate degree)
(Figure 6). An estimated 5.0 percent of registered nurses in the United States completed their training
outside of the United States and nearly half of them were from the Philippines, followed by Canada and
India.

Figure 5: Initial Nursing Education

Figure 6: Highest Nursing and Nursing-Related Educational Attainment

Associate Degree,
48.5%

Bachelor Degree,
39.3%

Graduate Degree, 0.9%

Diploma and
Other , 11.4%

Diploma in Nursing,
6.4%

Associate Degree,
29.6%

Bachelor Degree,
44.6%

Masters Degree
17.5%

Doctorate
Degree,

1.9%

Graduate Degree,
19.3%

Diploma in Nursing Associate Degree Bachelor Degree Masters Degree Doctorate Degree

7

Registered nurses may expand their scope of practice by earning a graduate degree and an advanced
practice certification including Nurse Practitioner (NP), Certified Nurse Specialist (CNS), Certified
Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), and Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM). This survey estimates that 11.5
percent of RNs (n=439,527) have completed their training for advanced practice, an increase from 8.1
percent in 2008. Figure 7 highlights the breakdown of all Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN)
licenses. 2 NPs accounted for 68.7 percent of all APRN licenses, followed by CNSs (19.6%), CRNAs (9.3%),
and CNMs (2.4%).

Figure 7: Distribution of Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Licenses

2 Nurses may hold multiple APRN licenses. Figure7 displays the distribution of APRN licenses.

68.7%

19.6%

9.3%

2.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Nurse Practitioner Certified Nurse Specialists Nurse Anesthetist Nurse Midwives

Pe
rc

en
t

of
a

ll
A

PR
N

L
ic

en
se

s

Type of APRN License

8

Employment
Among the 3,272,872 RNs who were employed in nursing, 78.9 percent worked full-time. Figure 8 shows
the distribution of full-time and part-time RNs who are currently employed by age. Most nurses reported
working in a hospital (59.9%), while others reported working at clinics and ambulatory settings (15.6%),
other inpatient settings (8.3%), and other types of settings (16.2%). When compared to women, the
percentage of men who reported working in a hospital was higher (67.8% for men and 55.6% for women)
(Figure 9). Approximately 16.6 percent of employed nurses did not have direct patient care as part of
their duties in their primary nursing position. Of the nurses who were actively licensed to practice but had
left their position held at the end of 2017, 12.9 percent reported that they stopped working due to
retirement. Table 1 in the appendix shows RN employment by state.

Figure 8: Distribution of Full-Time/Part-Time Employment by Age Group

11.8%

21.4% 22.1% 20.5%
16.6% 16.2% 18.1%

23.0%

37.5%

71.0% 71.6%

88.2%

78.6% 77.9% 79.5%
83.4% 83.8% 81.9%

77.0%

62.5%

29.0%
28.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

≤ 29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+

Pe
rc

en
t

of
N

ur
si

ng
W

or
kf

or
ce

Age

Part Time Full Time

9

Figure 9: Distribution of Employment Setting by Sex

Telehealth
Telehealth technologies in the workplace were reported by 32.9 percent of nurses (Figure 10). Of those
nurses, 50.3 percent reported using some form of telehealth in their primary nursing position. Participants
of the survey were asked what type of telehealth they utilized as part of their work. Provider-to-provider
consults accounted for 54.4 percent of type of telehealth usage and RN to patient direct calls accounted
for 49.2 percent (Figure 11).

67.8%
55.6%

15.1%

13.3%

5.5%

13.7%

11.6%
17.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Male Female

Hospital Other Inpatient Setting Clinic/Ambulatory Other Setting

10

Figure 10: Telehealth in the Workplace

Figure 11: Telehealth Usage by RNs

*Participants in this study had the option to select all that applied for this question

No, 67.1%

Yes, 32.9%

54.4%

49.2%

4.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Provider-to-Provider RN to Direct Patient NP Primary Care e-visits

Pe
rc

en
t

of
R

N
s

U
si

ng
T

el
eh

ea
lth

Type of Telehealth Usage

11

Salary and Earnings
In 2018, the median earnings for full-time RNs was $73,929, while part time RNs earned a median of
$39,985. The median earnings for RNs with and without a graduate degree are shown in Figure 13. The
highest median earnings were reported by Nurse Anesthetists ($161,076), followed by Certified Nurse
Midwives ($102,115), and Nurse Practitioners ($99,962) (Figure 14). Men in nursing also had higher
median earnings ($79,928) when compared to female nurses ($71,960) (Figure 12).

Figure 12: Median Full-Time Earnings by Sex Figure 13: Median Full-Time Earnings by Degree Type

Figure 14: Median Full-Time Earnings by Advanced Practice Type

$79,928
$71,960

$-

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

$90,000

$100,000

Male Female

Ea
rn

in
gs

Sex

$69,663

$95,804

$-

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

$90,000

$100,000

Without Graduate
Degree

With Graduate
Degree

Ea
rn

in
gs

Highest Degree Attainment

$99,962 $95,723 $102,115

$161,076

$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000

$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000

Nurse Practitioner Certified Nurse Specialist Nurse Midwife Nurse Anesthetist

Ea
rn

in
gs

APRN Type

12

Appendix

Table 1: RN Employment by State
State/Census Division Total Active

Licenses
Percent

Employed 3
Percent

Unemployed
New England

CONNECTICUT 52,265 82.7% 17.3%
MAINE 21,535 79.9% 20.1%

MASSACHUSETTS 111,545 83.5% 16.5%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 18,400 89.7% 10.3%

NEW ENGLAND OTHER* 22,464 87.8% 12.2%
Middle Atlantic

NEW JERSEY 97,103 84.6% 15.4%
NEW YORK 238,280 81.7% 18.3%

PENNSYLVANIA 193,212 81.5% 18.5%
East North Central

INDIANA 97,223 80.0% 20.0%
ILLINOIS 157,452 80.9% 19.1%

MICHIGAN 137,541 77.8% 22.2%
OHIO 184,000 82.4% 17.6%

WISCONSIN 88,565 80.3% 19.7%
West North Central

IOWA 46,180 84.2% 15.8%
NEBRASKA 25,044 92.6% 7.4%

KANSAS 42,927 81.6% 18.4%
MINNESOTA 89,047 83.8% 16.2%

MISSOURI 92,982 82.4% 17.6%
WEST NORTH CENTRAL OTHER* 25,734 89.2% 10.8%

South Atlantic
DELAWARE 15,894 86.1% 13.9%

WASHINGTON DC 13,028 95.8% 4.2%
FLORIDA 272,378 78.7% 21.3%
GEORGIA 108,599 85.1% 14.9%

MARYLAND 68,323 87.7% 12.3%
NORTH CAROLINA 120,647 84.7% 15.3%
SOUTH CAROLINA 40,586 78.7% 21.3%

VIRGINIA 89,801 84.7% 15.3%
WEST VIRGINIA 26,592 85.5% 14.5%

East South Central
ALABAMA 62,725 81.9% 18.1%
KENTUCKY 60,983 85.2% 14.8%

MISSISSIPPI 41,331 87.7% 12.3%
TENNESSEE 91,974 88.9% 11.1%

West South Central
ARKANSAS 36,726 82.0% 18.0%
LOUISIANA 54,067 85.5% 14.5%

3 Employment may include self-employment

13

State/Census Division Total Active
Licenses

Percent
Employed 3

Percent
Unemployed

OKLAHOMA 44,199 80.2% 19.8%
TEXAS 278,983 81.3% 18.7%

Mountain
ARIZONA 75,566 80.2% 19.8%

COLORADO 66,179 81.9% 18.1%
IDAHO 18,766 82.3% 17.7%

NEW MEXICO 23,215 84.9% 15.1%
UTAH 33,899 85.8% 14.2%

NEVADA 28,244 88.7% 11.3%
MOUNTAIN OTHER* 23,073 81.8% 18.2%

Pacific
ALASKA 10,298 87.9% 12.1%

CALIFORNIA 365,464 81.5% 18.5%
HAWAII 20,006 84.2% 15.8%
OREGON 46,490 88.6% 11.4%

WASHINGTON 78,127 88.4% 11.6%
* The weighted or unweighted cell counts for the population of active nurse licenses in these states did not
meet the Census disclosure avoidance standards for the Public Use File data. Please access the NSSRN Technical
Report for more information.

New England Other: Rhode Island, Vermont
West North Central Other: North Dakota, South Dakota
Mountain Other: Montana, Wyoming

  • Table of Contents
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • Executive Summary
  • Key Findings
  • Summary of Survey Methodology
  • Initial Findings from the NSSRN Survey
  • Appendix

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online