Two replies

Reply to classmate’s discussion (
answers to your peer of 200 words)

Classmate 1 post:

Healthcare professionals should proactively plan to update their knowledge and skills to respond to major public health issues through teamwork & collaboration, evidence-based practices, and clinical decision support systems. Notably, the issues and challenges that professionals and their clients face include rising healthcare costs, staffing shortages, and the integration of advanced technology to meet patient needs. Rising health care costs are due to a growing U.S. population. Staffing shortages are caused by an aging staff and a limited quantity of new nurses. Moreover, complex technology threatens the prompt delivery of quality care.

Teamwork and collaboration enable healthcare professionals to learn about challenges that impede the delivery of prompt care. The growing U.S. population requires medical experts to learn about the needs of the people. Therefore, one team will collect field data while another analyzes it enabling them to increase knowledge on the proper handling of rising healthcare costs (Brenner et al., 2020). The knowledge and skills aid the medical experts in improving patient outcomes and increasing patient satisfaction and efficiency.

Evidence-based practices are essential in handling staffing shortages in the health care sector. Although the practice of medicine is based on solid research, all medical professionals should adhere to delivering quality care and adhering to the standards of safety while focusing on the needs of patients. Thus, health experts learning more about evidence-based practices requires that nurses equip themselves with the RN to BSN program curriculum (Horntved et al., 2018). Ultimately, the knowledge and skills will enable professionals to manage challenges that result from a lack of staff since they can teach new nurses about required care.

Clinical decision support systems enhance medical decisions by targeting the needs of both patients and nurse practitioners. For example, new laboratory systems hinder proper diagnosis because medical experts lack knowledge about how to operate the technology (Sutton et al., 2020). Health professionals can thus utilize computer-based programs to learn about EHRs and the required guidelines that assist health care providers to learn about new technologies and meet the expected standards.

All in all, major public health issues and challenges faced by health professionals require acquiring appropriate skills and knowledge. As evidenced above, the medical experts should proactively learn more about what hinders them from providing required services, and implement necessary mitigation measures.

References

Brenner, M. J., Pandian, V., Milliren, C. E., Graham, D. A., Zaga, C., Morris, L. L., … & Roberson, D. W. (2020). Global Tracheostomy Collaborative: Data-driven improvements in patient safety through multidisciplinary teamwork, standardization, education, and patient partnership. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 125(1), e104-e118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.054

Horntvedt, M. E. T., Nordsteien, A., Fermann, T., & Severinsson, E. (2018). Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: A thematic literature review. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1278-z

Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y

Classmate 2 post:

 Resolving issues that medical organization faces would necessitate substantial adjustments in how clinics are constructed—experienced health care workers from the center of such an organization. Training health care workers for this responsibility necessitates a shared vision throughout professions based on a devotion to fulfilling clients’ needs (Morgan et al., 2017). The healthcare organization is based on a complicated web of treatment plans and channels. The quality of the medical institution’s care is strongly based on how well this network functions. Quality management is related to solving the problems affecting quality care the chance, authority, expertise, and materials they need to solve them. It comprises a planned and organized strategy that leverages certain approaches and tools to achieve demonstrable progress (Shea et al.,2018).  Notably, it is imperative for the care providers to get training to provide patient-focused care to form part of a multidisciplinary team, with a focus on evidence-based administration, quality improvement measures, and information.

Healthcare often develops skills to provide patient-centered care to enable them to recognize dignity, support clients’ distinctions, values, desires, and individual needs; alleviate pain and anguish, and emphasize public health concerns (Coles et al., 2022). Illness-focused and clinician-oriented treatment, which focuses on treating a condition without regard for the patient’s requirements and relies only on the medical professional for management, does not conform with evolving patient wants and expectations. Clients are getting increasingly more willing to take part in personalized medication suggestions that are connected to their interests, and viewpoints and represent an insight of their framework, which includes their personal affairs, occupation, family ties, diverse culture, and other variables, resulting in patient satisfaction.

Besides, healthcare providers cooperate, interact, connect, and incorporate care in interprofessional collaboration to guarantee continuous and dependable service. A transdisciplinary team comprises people from many professions and vocations who have specialized understanding, skills, and approaches (Coles et al., 2022). Team members combine their views, areas of competence, and decision-making domains to coordinate, interact, and connect to maximize treatment for clients.

Additionally, the caregivers also utilize informatics to use information technologies to interact, manage expertise, reduce mistakes, and assist decision making. It has been demonstrated that information management applications can improve patient safety by regulating and automating some choices and detecting problems, such as harmful medication interactions before they happen (Coles et al., 2022). Similarly, digital medical records, which eliminate handwritten information, are critical to reducing mistakes.

At the same time, healthcare providers use evidence-oriented practice to incorporate best studies with clinical skills and client preferences for optimum treatment and engage in training and research initiatives as much as possible. Health practitioners may continually promote optimal practices and minimize underuse, abuse, and treatment excess by drawing on the dynamic evidence base (Morgan et al., 2017). Notably, it is essential for multidisciplinary clinical staff to successfully tap this scientific basis on the occasion of patient safety, defining whether an action, including a preventive delivery, diagnosis, or medication, can be anticipated to deliver better results than options.

Moreover, the caregivers implement performance improvement to examine errors and risks in care; comprehend and pertain basic prevention design concepts such as centralization and streamlining; continuously understand and quantify quality care based on the framework, process, and consequences in connection to client and society necessities (Morgan et al., 2017). They design and test initiatives to change mechanisms and structures of services to improve performance. To reduce waste, reduce mistakes, boost efficiency, and eventually enhance standard care, care delivery corporations actively, embrace methodologies and practices that emerged in various economic revolutions, including total quality administration and perpetual quality improvement.

 

References

Brandrud, A. S., Nyen, B., Hjortdahl, P., Sandvik, L., Helljesen Haldorsen, G. S., Bergli, M., … & Bretthauer, M. (2017). Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare–a nationwide case study. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1-9.

Coles, E., Anderson, J., Maxwell, M., Harris, F. M., Gray, N. M., Milner, G., & MacGillivray, S. (2020). The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1-22.

Morgan, H. M., Entwistle, V. A., Cribb, A., Christmas, S., Owens, J., Skea, Z. C., & Watt, I. S. (2017). We need to talk about purpose: a critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals’ approaches to self‐management support for people with long‐term conditions. Health Expectations, 20(2), 243-259.

Shea, C. M., Turner, K., Albritton, J., & Reiter, K. L. (2018). Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: the role of organizations, teams, and individuals. Health care management review, 43(3), 261.