CIT Interview Techniques: Summary Report about the information gleaned from the interview process, drawing connections and connecting to scholarly leadership research

Description

Details:

As the second part of the CIT Interview Techniques assignment (steps 4-5 of the CIT process), write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process in Topic 7 (steps 1-3 of the CIT process).

Interview Summary Report:

Write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process, drawing connections and connecting to scholarly leadership research.
Conclude the paper with a discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process.
The Summary Report should also include the raw data collected as in the original paper, in at least three appendices, and in question and answer format.

Use three to five scholarly resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Top of Form

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New Attempt

Bottom of Form

Title

Attached Documents

Turnitin Report

Similarity Index

Final Submission

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Top of Form

Apply Rubrics

CIT Interview Techniques: Summary Report

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
30.0 % Write a summary about the CIT interview process	Summary Report is irrelevant—it fails to summarize information gleaned from CIT interview process.	Summary Report is somewhat relevant, —it is underdeveloped and inadequately summarizes information gleaned from CIT interview process.	Summary Report is relevant—it adequately summarizes information gleaned from CIT interview process.	Summary Report is relevant—it proficiently summarizes information gleaned from CIT interview process.	Summary Report is relevant—it insightfully summarizes information gleaned from CIT interview process.
30.0 % Discuss the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process.	Discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process is missing.	Discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process is vague and inconsistent.	Discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process is present and appropriate.	Discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process is present, clear, and makes some connection to research.	Discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
10.0 % Raw data included and supported with scholarly research.	Raw data is not included or supported with scholarly research.	Raw data is inappropriate and vague, data is not supported with scholarly research.	Raw data is present but slightly vague, data is not entirely supported with scholarly research.	Raw data is present. Data is supported with some research.	Raw data is present and clear. Data is supported with current scholarly research.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
15.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage